Ed Shaw Law - No Nonsense Legal Advice
Call 800-507-0352 To Schedule A Consultation
Call
To Schedule A Consultation
Offices in St. Cloud and Brainerd, serving all surrounding areas
Coronavirus Impact and Assurance: Yes! We are still open for business!

For the last year, thanks to the hard work of all of our staff, and you, our clients, no one who works at this office has gotten Covid while working here, and we have not spread a single case to any of our clients, while getting all of our client's legal needs taken care of. With the spread of vaccination the end is in sight, normal times where we can meet our clients in person in the office are just around the corner.

During the transition we will be having some in person, in office appointments for clients who have already been vaccinated, and for whom the CDC recommended period of time has passed since their last shot. Of course, for anyone who would prefer a phone or video appointment for safety, convenience, or any other reason those types of appointments are always available.

For our clients who have not yet completed the vaccination cycle phone and video appointments are of course available, and, with the return of warm weather we will again be offering outside appointments under the tent right outside our front door. For all appointments, masks will continue to be required.

Through the transition safety of all staff and clients will continue to be our top priority, we look forward to seeing you soon.

Please see our blog for more info on pandemic response.

Things Are Not Always What They Seem

| Mar 18, 2017 | Uncategorized

How often do we see a sensational news story, so and so arrested, charged with this or that heinous crime. We assume, how awful, how could they do such a thing, what a terrible person they must be. We forget that accusations are easy to make, all it takes is someone, usually from law enforcement, filing what is called s Statement of Probable Cause saying why they think someone committed a crime. If someone wants you arrested, it does not take much for them to make it happen.

Case in point, someone I have known for many years, Jim Hunter, a 67 year old man, recently elected mayor of a local community, with no criminal record was recently arrested on a Friday, ensuring that he would spend the weekend in jail before even seeing a judge. The Statement of Probable Cause, filled out by an officer with a known grudge against Mr. Hunter, who was not happy that Mr. Hunter won a recent election, made it seem like he had committed terrible crimes. Result, he was arrested, jailed, his name was all over the media, causing great harm to his business and reputation. The charges against him are based on statements by the officer with a grudge, and by statements of two other individuals who had previously confronted him to the point where he obtained restraining orders against them from the Court months before the current charges were filed. He is charged with assault based on an incident that happened 6 months ago where two individuals less than half his age confronted him while he was in his truck parked at his property. One of these people was subject to the restraining order granted by the Court in favor of Mr. Hunter due to acts of harassment against Mr. Hunter. A fraud charge is based on an accusation made by the other man who Mr. Hunter obtained a restraining order against. The restraining order was based on several incidents of harassment, including yelling at Mr. Hunter on the main street in town while grabbing his crotch. These accusations found a receptive ear in the officer who was not happy about the election results, and was more than happy to see Mr. Hunter go down. The officer added claims that Mr. Hunter was somehow a risk to flee the area. A 67 year old man, with no criminal record whatsoever, who has lived in a community for years, owning businesses and a home there, is about as low a risk to flee as you can have. This claim appears to have been made for the sole purpose of keeping Mr. Hunter in jail over the weekend.

I hope that the media covers the result of the trial as well as they have covered the accusation. An accusation against someone means nothing, they are cheap. Fortunately, in our system accusations have to be proven in court to a jury for a citizen to be convicted. I expect that the accusers will have a very tough time doing that in this case.

Ed

Fox 9 Interview with Ed:

http://www.fox9.com/news/241989744-story

Image
FindLaw Network